
PII and Law Firm Sales – Top Tips from Jonathan Fagan Business Brokers
Its that time of year again when professional indemnity insurance becomes a driving factor for law firm buyers. Renewal premiums are sent out and certain firms & individuals are in urgent need of acquiring a law firm of some sort and doing it quickly. These types of deal tend to be time driven, and are usually unsuitable for most sellers looking for an exit. However, it does bring up a number of points relating to PII and selling law firms. Here are our top bits of advice (and those we spend time on the phone each week talking about!).
If your law firm has an outstanding PII claim against it, it will be hard (if not impossible) to sell
Possibly goes without saying, but we get a lot of calls on this. If you have an outstanding claim against your firm, it is highly unlikely anyone will want to a) buy it or b) take it off your hands. In these cases continuing to trade tends to be the best option as even though your insurance may go up, it will also come down in future. Buyers look at PII premiums as a guide for whether to make an acquisition and a high premium will put most off. Work through the crisis period and look for a disposal in the future when the premiums have gone down.
PII brokers are not your friend
When it comes to law firm sales, PII brokers seem to spend a lot of their time trying to scupper deals going through by demanding lots of information about prospective buyers and/or increasing premiums wherever they can. This may be an unfair generalisation, but are there insurance proposal forms for other professions that have similar questions on them to these (all taken from broker proposal forms this year)?
- I/We [..] intend to undergo any change in structure (e.g. Conversion to LLP or Limited Company), succession, merger, change of member(s) or partner(s) – Yes/No
- Does the Policyholder plan to succeed, purchase or merge with any Practice in the next 18 months?
- Is the Policyholder intending to become an ABS or MDP in the next 12 months?
Does your broker really have the right to know about your business thinking – what does it have to do with them before any actual event? The only reason they would ever want to know this (we think) is to work out how much extra to charge you. We have also heard horror stories of PII insurers only offering short periods of renewal cover because they have been informed of intentions to sell or close a business. Be very careful indeed.
Converting to a Limited Company Improves Saleability
Although your PII cover will need to increase, it is much easier to sell a limited company law firm than it is a sole practitioner. Even if the firm is effectively a sole practitioner operating via a limited company it is easier to sell. Your PII premiums will probably increase; £3 million of cover is required for a limited company as opposed to £2 million for a sole practitioner. It tends to be the PII that causes any holdups in what should be a fairly simple conversion.
Insurers want you to pay run off cover
When an SRA regulated law firm closes down, PII insurers require run off cover to be paid. If an SRA regulated law firm carries on trading, or is acquired by a successor practice, no run off cover is paid. Run off cover usually costs c2.5-3.5 x most recent premium, and can be ruinous for anyone having to pay it, particularly when PII premiums are high, for example in conveyancing practices. From the PII side, it is potentially very profitable business.
As a result of this, it is very beneficial to find a successor of some sort when you want to make a disposal of a practice. Unless you practice in a very low risk area of law (eg family, immigration or crime), closing down your business is going to cost a substantial amount of money. Finding a successor prepared to take over will remove the liability. Insurers are very much aware of this.
Selling prior to renewing PII is rarely a good idea
We often take calls from sellers wanting to sell up before they have to renew their PII insurance. Makes sense, I guess. Sell the practice, walk away without having to stump up the insurance premiums or go through the renewal process.
However it is rarely a benefit to anyone. As a buyer, if I plan to purchase an SRA regulated law firm which is coming up to renewal, I will be very aware that an insurer could decide that I am high risk and decline to renew the insurance. If I purchase a firm that has 12 months worth of PII cover already in place, and the correct notifications to insurers have been made (eg new partners, new structure, new owners, new areas of law) and I know that I have insurance for the next 12 months confirmed, this business has a lot more value to me than the former. As a seller, it is very possible a buyer will want you to hang around until the PII has been renewed, which may mean you are tied into a business for much longer than expected.
PII drives the sale/merger process
Often, it is not the SRA authorisation side of the sale process that causes hold ups or issues for sellers and buyers; it is the PII. Buyers tend not to be too put out by the SRA process – after all if a solicitor acquires another solicitors firm, the process is usually to fill out a form to notify the SRA. The only sticking points and delays tend to be caused by disciplinary issues and conditions on practising certificates, as well as any planned conversions to ABS or non-lawyer owners being involved.
PII is a completely different ball game. New partners, new owners, new types of law all seem to cause jittery insurers, who then start to fire off forms, demands for business plans, CVs, details of previous law firm work and much more besides. Delays almost always arise around the PII and this is the area to concentrate on if you are considering an acquisition or sale.